A spectrum from Apatite.
A local charms and trinkets shop in West Hampstead London also sells ‘healing’ stones that give off ‘energy’. I believe the proprietor to be sincere in her claims and have no wish to be snide about her beliefs but I was more curious about the tangible properties of the gemstones that I could relate to so I took out my PDS-100 and asked her if I could scan them. The background level in the shop was slightly elevated and in no time I found the source to be small collection of Apatite stones. Putting the detector directly on the stones raise the count from about 20 to 80+ cps. I wanted to find out more regards their origin but I was having difficulty explaining what was going on, the proprietor who had no grasp of basic physics, seemed to getting more nervous the more I tried to explain. So I just bought a handful and took them home.
The unshielded background for my CsI detector is 120 cps, shielding reduces this to 7cps. The 5 or 6 Apatite stones that fit comfortably in my palm (under shielding) gave 170+ cps.
Here is the spectrum I obtained - energy summed. I am very inexperienced at this I think this is a signal example of a Thorium Series.
Apatite Mineral
Apatite Mineral
Matthew Pickard
-
ipelupessy
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 27 Jul 2019, 00:39
- Contact:
Re: Apatite Mineral
well..the desciption is spot on: "stimulates creativity and helps align higher knowledge"!
about your spectrum: the bump you label K-40 - isn't that the double escape peak? (2614-1022)?
about your spectrum: the bump you label K-40 - isn't that the double escape peak? (2614-1022)?
Re: Apatite Mineral
Hello Ipelupessy, Thanks. Yes looking at the original data - I think I mislabelled and meant to apply 'k-40,' to the peak immediately to the left. I think the peak I labelled k-40 is Ac-228 at 1588 KeV, and I see Bi-212 broadcasts on 1620 KeV and Ac-228 on 1630 KeV too, may be they are mixed in there as well?. PRA said Gaussian for the the actual k-40 peak to the left was 1454 KeV (sd 20) and the mislabelled peak has a mean of 1609 KeV (sd 29). That was the with the original calibration using the extreme ends of Ba-133 and Na-22. I later re-calibrated using known Th peaks and got a better fit but I forgot to save that result - may be I'll do it again this weekend and get a better number for the mislabelled peak. And perhaps the unlabelled peak just around 2100 KeV in my new calibration above is the double escape peak?
Matthew Pickard
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests