Here is a rare comparison for Maralingite vs Trinitite, using the same Maralingite sample shown above. The results are corrected for mass (3.3g Maralingite sample) and detector efficiency, but still no correction for background counts - I'll put a new graph later.
The Maralinga sample looks to be more active than average Trinitite, however, sample size is too small to draw strong conclusions.
Many thanks to Daniela Pittauerova, William Kolb, Marievi Souti and Helmut Fischer for this great cooperation.
Maralingite
-
Svilen
- Posts: 185
- Joined: 23 Sep 2016, 04:25
Re: Maralingite
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.