Here is a rare comparison for Maralingite vs Trinitite, using the same Maralingite sample shown above. The results are corrected for mass (3.3g Maralingite sample) and detector efficiency, but still no correction for background counts - I'll put a new graph later.
The Maralinga sample looks to be more active than average Trinitite, however, sample size is too small to draw strong conclusions.
Many thanks to Daniela Pittauerova, William Kolb, Marievi Souti and Helmut Fischer for this great cooperation.
Maralingite
Re: Maralingite
Svilen
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests