In-situ CdZnTe Spectra from Belarus

Share your spectra and discuss their features here
Lposter
Posts: 31
Joined: 13 Jan 2018, 08:01

In-situ CdZnTe Spectra from Belarus

Post by Lposter » 13 Jan 2018, 08:41

Here are a couple of in-situ spectra taken with a 1 cc CdZnTe detector over lands contaminated by Chernobyl in Belarus.

Detector unshielded, suspended 1 m over the surface. Fairly standard Cs-137 spectra but a nice resolution from the detector even though its very small and not as efficient as a larger NaI or whatever.

All natural isotopes drowned out by the strength of the signal from the Cs-137.

Lars
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Sesselmann
Posts: 1392
Joined: 27 Apr 2015, 11:40

Re: In-situ CdZnTe Spectra from Belarus

Post by Sesselmann » 13 Jan 2018, 13:47

Lars,

Thanks for posting, very satisfying resolution on those CZT detectors.

Steven

Alain
Posts: 22
Joined: 05 Jul 2018, 06:57

Re: In-situ CdZnTe Spectra from Belarus

Post by Alain » 09 Jul 2018, 09:28

Hi Lars,

extremely intersting :) From many travelers I've heard that in Belarus are extreme tight laws and rules and you certainly don't dare to smuggle out even a gram of such soil. But it would be interesting to know, if you have any data about specific activity (Bq/kg) of specific surface activity (Bq/m2) of soil at the place, where you have done spectra recording?

Lposter
Posts: 31
Joined: 13 Jan 2018, 08:01

Re: In-situ CdZnTe Spectra from Belarus

Post by Lposter » 06 Aug 2018, 18:22

Hei Alain

Belarus has adopted a different approach to Ukraine in their management of contaminated sites and are somewhat stricter.

I did recording near the Ukrainian border about 15 km from the plant itself. The deposition is very heterogenous and varies wildly over short distances. Densities about 1.4 MBq/m2 137Cs are the sort of levels that can be found. If you assume that is taken from the top 10 cm of soil and the density is 1 g/cc, then that would be 100 cm by 100 cm by 10 = 100 000 cm3 or 100 kg. Which would be of the order of 14 kBq/kg or thereabouts I think? I have no idea what it was at the exact spot I took a spectrum from.

I was hoping perhaps to see 241Am as that is ingrowing from deposited Pu (its at levels of 100 kBq/m2 nowadays) but the lower end of the spectrum was very messy. From scattering I assume?

P