Hello Folks,
I've built myself a small SiPm Detector with a crystal CsI(Ti).
SiliconePhotomultipiers basically work the same as PMT Tubes, but are alot smaller (the size of a photo diode) and do not require high voltage. They run between 20-30V DC which can be generated from low voltage (like usb or Battery) and the electronics do take a small space. SiPms come in different sizes, usually 1x1, 3x3 and 6x6 mm, also arrays are available which are combinations of single sipm's on a pcb board. The only disadantage is their size limitation, to operate on big crystals usually arrays of multiple sipms are required, and these are currently very pricey (~400$ for a 2x2 6mm2 Array).
For my experiment I've chosen the MICROFC-60035 from SensL/Onsemi which already comes assembled on a pcb board https://uk.farnell.com/on-semiconductor ... dp/2949118
Sipms are very difficult to solder at home since they have only leads on the underside (BGA Device) and are sensitive to temperature and chemicals, so i decided to go with the eval board that already has the Sipm assembled.
The used crystal is a 8.5x8.5x30mm CsI(Ti). To make the detector robust i printed a little enclosure to put in the PCB and crystal. The crystal I've got from luuk, and he also installed the crystal inside the holder.
For the Readout i made a small pcb with the following components:
- Power Supply (based on LT3482, Analog Devices, APD Power Supply IC)
- Micro controller (STM32G431, ST Microelectronics, USB Connection and DAC for controlling Bias Voltage)
- Signal Processing (copied from physicsopenlab.org)
- Auxiliary Parts
Sipm's do not like hard power on, so i use the digital-to-analog converter of the micro controller to ramp-up the bias voltage, and also control the voltage. The voltage can be controlled from 24 to 32V and will ramp up from zero to the set voltage in ~10 Seconds.
Images of the Detector (it was wrapped in black tape afterwards) and Control PCB:
the detector was tested by luuk with a resolution of 6.4% for Cs-137. My tests with Theremino resulted in 6.1%, but since i've have no knowledge how to set the parameters of the SiPm and theremino usually "lies" a bit about resolution, I'm sure this is also 6.4% or close to it. For a quick view, i also run pra, but i did not do any calibration or settings for the moment. Here are the results:
The next step will be to try building a different readout, which consist of a peak-and-hold detector, so the MCU can directly sample the data. Also i will experiment on a "playback" feature which will use the dac to emulate recorded pulses to PRA and Theremino. Also i will do some effort to make this system "portable" and might even update to a 2x2 Array of the same Sipm to use with a bigger crysta
First Test of SiPm Detector
-
sgt_bear
- Posts: 117
- Joined: 16 Jan 2017, 07:06
First Test of SiPm Detector
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
GigaBecquerel
- Posts: 172
- Joined: 04 Jul 2020, 07:34
Re: First Test of SiPm Detector
Hi Jonathan,
I really like your detector!
The result is very good, can you guesstimate a detection efficiency, what was your Cs activity?
I really like your detector!
The result is very good, can you guesstimate a detection efficiency, what was your Cs activity?
-
Sesselmann
- Posts: 1398
- Joined: 27 Apr 2015, 11:40
Re: First Test of SiPm Detector
Jonathan,
Very nice project, thanks for sharing, also on my list of things to do.
You have three cables coming from the evaluation board, does this mean that there is a coupling on the board?
Steven
Very nice project, thanks for sharing, also on my list of things to do.
You have three cables coming from the evaluation board, does this mean that there is a coupling on the board?
Steven
-
Conor Whyte
- Posts: 126
- Joined: 28 Apr 2019, 15:06
Re: First Test of SiPm Detector
Wow, that is super cool! Very good efficiency for that tiny a crystal. I wonder what would happen you coupled the output to a RedPitaya?
-
luuk
- Posts: 313
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 21:00
Re: First Test of SiPm Detector
Hi Jonathan,
It turned out really nice and it looks like all is working great, I like the design of the pcb.
Resolution is maybe a little to good but so you should check linearity that could give problems.
Luuk
It turned out really nice and it looks like all is working great, I like the design of the pcb.
Resolution is maybe a little to good but so you should check linearity that could give problems.
Luuk
-
sgt_bear
- Posts: 117
- Joined: 16 Jan 2017, 07:06
Re: First Test of SiPm Detector
The aciticity is 0.25uCi +-20%. The Runtime was 2642second, with 350670 counts and 132.8cps. Since the backround is around 10cps, i would guess the true counts of the Cs-137 source is 325k CountsGigaBecquerel wrote: ↑02 Sep 2020, 06:32The result is very good, can you guesstimate a detection efficiency, what was your Cs activity?
No coupling. The SiPm evaluation pcb contains a "fast out" which is directly connected inside the SIPM and gives incredibly fast pulses, much faster than the energy pule (which is clamped between the restistor on +Vbias and the sipm itself, just like the PMT connections are.Steven Sesselmann wrote: ↑02 Sep 2020, 08:15You have three cables coming from the evaluation board, does this mean that there is a coupling on the board?
The brown wire is the fast-out. It does not lead anywhere, i just soldered it to the pins so it does not fly around
-
Polon
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 13 Oct 2020, 02:24
Re: First Test of SiPm Detector
Jonathan,
does the output voltage changes from the power supply accurately correct the SiPM temperature coefficient?
does the output voltage changes from the power supply accurately correct the SiPM temperature coefficient?
-
sgt_bear
- Posts: 117
- Joined: 16 Jan 2017, 07:06
Re: First Test of SiPm Detector
Currently it does not, but since this is my personal "eval board" i will experiment with it and then create a final design ;)
-
Polon
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 13 Oct 2020, 02:24
Re: First Test of SiPm Detector
I think that a good solution would be to place the detector in a thermally insulated casing and stabilize its operating temperature with a Peltier cell.